February 16, By: James J. Fazzalaro, Principal Analyst. You asked that we look at the organizational structures of other states ' transportation agencies to identify those that may divide responsibility for highway and public transportation functions into separate agencies. We assessed the organizational structures of state transportation agencies in all 50 states by examining their organizational charts and unit descriptions through their internet websites.
Based on this analysis, we grouped the states into four categories. The most common form of organization appeared to be one in which the state had a single state transportation agency that was organized into division or organizational units based on functional activities such as administration, finance, planning, engineering, operations, and construction.
In this model, activities relating to different non-highway modes of transportation typically were grouped together under one of these divisions or organizational units. We felt that 22 states could be considered to fall into this type of organizational model to one degree or another.
The second organizational category was one in which the state has a single transportation agency and is divided into organizational units that include at least two separate bureaus or divisions set up specifically to conduct activities for a single non-highway transportation mode.
Some of these agencies also may have organizational units set up by functional activity, such as administration, finance, or engineering, but the distinguishing characteristic that we felt separated them from the wholly functional organizational model was the existence of distinct modal bureaus or divisions.
We put Connecticut and 15 other states into this category. The third type of organizational category was one where we could identify no distinct public transportation component in the organizational structure. While these agencies could be either functionally or modally organized, or a hybrid of both types of organization, the organizational structure appeared to have no identifiable public transportation unit. Although these agencies might be performing some non-highway mode functions, such as administration of federal grants, it appeared that this was being carried out without distinct units assigned to these functions.Massport signs deal for Worcester Airport
We felt that five states fell into this organizational model. The fourth organizational category was one where some or all of the non-highway transportation mode functions are performed by organizations that are either independent of or partially independent of the state transportation agency that is responsible for the highway system. We felt that seven states were examples of this type of organizational structure.
The degree of differentiation of function into independent agencies varied from Delaware where all public transportation functions are performed by a quasi-public corporation while all other functions are performed by the department of transportation to Virginia, where highways, rail and public transportation, aviation, ports, and motor vehicle matters are all performed by state agencies that operate independently and report separately to a cabinet level transportation secretary.
The following summarizes the states that we placed into each of these four organizational models. Transportation Agencies Organized by Functional Activity. Transportation Agencies Organized by Transportation Mode. Multi-Agency Transportation Organizations. The remainder of this report provides a brief narrative description of the organizational structures of each state ' s transportation agencies based on these categorizations.
In the last section, which describes seven states with multi-agency organizations, we have identified each of the agencies in the state and provided a description of its responsibility. One model under which some transportation agencies function is one in which the components are organized by functional activity rather than transportation mode.
Responsibility for different modes of transportation typically falls within a single functional component such as a program management or operations division or possibly more than one division.
What distinguishes this model from the modal form of organization is that the individual transportation modes are not distinct organizational entities. The 22 states which we felt primarily exhibited this type of organizational model are described below. The department is organized into 22 bureaus. Most are specific to agency functions, such as finance and audits, personnel, planning, research and development, and maintenance.
All of the non-highway transportation modes are within the Multi Modal Bureau except for aeronautics, which has its own bureau. The special programs division administers the transportation enhancement, bicycle, and pedestrian program and the transportation community and system preservation pilot program.
Although the agency is fundamentally a highway agency, public transportation matters are handled under the planning and research division. Within this division are located a public transportation unit, a rural public transportation unit, and an elderly and disabled transportation unit. Besides the planning and research division, there is a design division and an operations division that report to the chief engineer.
Several administrative divisions such as fiscal services, computer services, human resources, and public affairs report to the chief administrative officer. The five member highway commission is mandated in the state constitution to administer the transportation agency.As usual, employees of UMass were the highest earners on the state payroll inaccording to data from the state comptroller's office.
University salaries do not come entirely from taxpayer money, since the university gets research grants, fundraises and is paid for services it provides. Generally, the university establishes salaries in relation to what people at comparable institutions are paid for doing comparable jobs. Three were coaches, and three were faculty with the UConn Health Center. Four people working under Meehan earned more than that:. As is typical, academia provided most of the state's top earners, followed by the state police.
Police officers frequently earn extra pay for overtime or special details. Explore data on state pay for the calendar year in the database below. Note to readers: if you purchase something through one of our affiliate links we may earn a commission. All rights reserved About Us. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Advance Local. Community Rules apply to all content you upload or otherwise submit to this site.
Ad Choices. By Shira Schoenberg sschoenberg repub. Cloud Database.Below are the available bulk discount rates for each individual item when you purchase a certain amount.
Massport - Issued Parking Tickets
Register as a Premium Educator at hbsp. Publication Date: March 29, Industry: Government. Industry: Transportation. Source: Harvard Business School. If you'd like to share this PDF, you can purchase copyright permissions by increasing the quantity. Home Case Studies Organizational Development. Ferlins. Quantity price applied. Add Copyright Permission. Copyright Permission Qty:. Current Stock:. Buying for your team?
See quantity pricing. This is a copyrighted PDF. Add copies before sharing with your team. Are you an educator? Product : Pages: 6.
Newsletter Promo Summaries and excerpts of the latest books, special offers, and more from Harvard Business Review Press. Sign up. This Product Also Appears In. Buy Together.We've made some changes to EPA. Massport was issued a permit for discharging storm water to Boston Harbor on March 1, The permit expired five years later.
However, EPA administratively continued the permit as allowed by regulations. EPA issued a draft permit and fact sheet which provides EPA's technical basis for establishing effluent limits and monitoring for public comment on July 25, After consideration of the comments received during the comment period which ended on October 23,EPA revised the draft permit.
Generally, the permit increases the amount of monitoring required at Logan and requires effluent limits at the major outfalls. For the first time, the permit requires monitoring of the outfalls that drain the runways and the perimeter roadway. During winter storm events, the permit requires Massport to sample the drainage from the runways and the perimeters for ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, biological oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total ammonia nitrogen, and two toxic additives to deicing agents, nonylphenol and tolyltriazole.
The permit also requires WET testing, in order to help determine whether the discharge causes, has the reasonable potential to cause, or contributes to an excursion above a numeric or narrative criterion for whole effluent toxicity. The purpose of the plan is to minimize the release of pollutants to Boston Harbor. Pursuant to the SWPPP, Massport and the Co-Permittees are required to develop BMPs to identify and reduce sources of pollution related to deicing and anti-icing, bacteria, fuel and oil, and rubber removal.
Furthermore, the permit requires Massport to perform a Water Quality Study to help increase the understanding of the discharges from the airport to determine whether the discharges cause a water quality violation. As part of the Water Quality Study, Massport is required to calculate a dilution factor for each outfall, for potential use by EPA and MassDEP in order to establish water quality based limits in the future, if necessary.
Additionally, as part of the Water Quality Study, Massport is required to perform real-time monitoring of the outfalls, during a deicing episode, with expected contamination of deicers Outfall,and for parameters including temperature, DO, and conductivity, to be representative of a storm event discharge from each outfall. Finally, in consideration of comments received from the public, the final permit contains additional requirements for public notification.
The final permit will require Massport to make the results of its monitoring available on its web site and provide a copy of each report including all environmental reports to the Boston Public Health Commission, City of Boston Environment Department, and the Winthrop Town Manager's office.
If you have any questions please contact George Papadopoulos by phone ator by email at papadopoulos. Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem. Jump to main content. An official website of the United States government. Contact Us.The Massachusetts Port Authority was created in by the Massachusetts General Court to replace the locally controlled port commission;   however, the Authority was not enabled until due to delay in bond funding.
Inthe Authority constructed a second container port in Charlestown for the use of other shipping companies. InSea-Land ended its exclusive lease, and the first container port was enlarged and made available for other shipping companies. In Juneby a vote of 5-to-2, Massport's board of directors selected the current port director to serve as the authority's chief executive. By state law, municipal police such as the Boston Police Department do not have jurisdiction on Massport property.
Massport Fire Rescue provides fire protection on agency property. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Archived from the original PDF on April 17, Retrieved on January 22, Section 2.
The Berkshire Eagle. Pittsfield, Massachusetts. June 21, Retrieved February 13, — via newspapers. Retrieved February 13, October 6, Archived from the original on Retrieved The Boston Globe. Section Retrieved June 26, December 17, Archived from the original PDF on CS1 maint: archived copy as title link.
Massachusetts Port Authority. Lisa Wieland. Thomas P. Glynn Peter I. King John F. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. In other projects Wikimedia Commons.Even before you start reading a business case study just make sure that you have brushed up the Harvard Business Review HBR fundamentals on the Organizational Development.
Brushing up HBR fundamentals will provide a strong base for investigative reading. Often readers scan through the business case study without having a clear map in mind.
This leads to unstructured learning process resulting in missed details and at worse wrong conclusions. Reading up the HBR fundamentals helps in sketching out business case study analysis and solution roadmap even before you start reading the case study.
The page you were looking for doesn't exist.
It also provides starting ideas as fundamentals often provide insight into some of the aspects that may not be covered in the business case study itself. To write an emphatic case study analysis and provide pragmatic and actionable solutions, you must have a strong grasps of the facts and the central problem of the HBR case study. Begin slowly - underline the details and sketch out the business case study description map.
In some cases you will able to find the central problem in the beginning itself while in others it may be in the end in form of questions. Business case study paragraph by paragraph mapping will help you in organizing the information correctly and provide a clear guide to go back to the case study if you need further information. My case study strategy involves. Once you are comfortable with the details and objective of the business case study proceed forward to put some details into the analysis template.
You can do business case study analysis by following Fern Fort University step by step instructions. Once you finished the case analysis, time line of the events and other critical details. Focus on the following. In our live classes we often come across business managers who pinpoint one problem in the case and build a case study analysis and solution around that singular point. Business environments are often complex and require holistic solutions.
You should try to understand not only the organization but also the industry which the business operates in. Porter Five Forces is a strategic analysis tool that will help you in understanding the relative powers of the key players in the business case study and what sort of pragmatic and actionable case study solution is viable in the light of given facts.
You should make a list of factors that have significant impact on the organization and factors that drive growth in the industry. Once you have developed multipronged approach and work out various suggestions based on the strategic tools.
The next step is organizing the solution based on the requirement of the case. You can use the following strategy to organize the findings and suggestions.
The goal of the business case study is not only to identify problems and recommend solutions but also to provide a framework to implement those case study solutions.
Implementation framework differentiates good case study solutions from great case study solutions. If you able to provide a detailed implementation framework then you have successfully achieved the following objectives. Implementation framework helps in weeding out non actionable recommendations, resulting in awesome Massport C : A Revitalized Organization case study solution. Once you finished the case study implementation framework.
Massport (B): Change at the Top
Take a small break, grab a cup of coffee or whatever you like, go for a walk or just shoot some hoops. After refreshing your mind, read your case study solution critically. When we are writing case study solution we often have details on our screen as well as in our head.
This leads to either missing details or poor sentence structures. Once refreshed go through the case solution again - improve sentence structures and grammar, double check the numbers provided in your analysis and question your recommendations. Be very slow with this process as rushing through it leads to missing key details. Once done it is time to hit the attach button.
Massachusetts Port Authority
Amazing Business Data Maps. Send your data or let us do the research.Log in or Sign up. Job Opportunities Massachusetts Port Authority. Surprised this is reposted. GooseFeb 10, Joel98 and USAF like this. The way things are organized is a bit jacked up. I remember when the toll collectors had badges. There are two different types of "police officers" over at Massport.
You will sometimes see Port Officers working details at the airport but the gate guards at Logan are "aviation officers" and are unarmed but have the exact same uniforms as the Port Officers the only divergence is that the badge says "aviation officer" not "port officer". The port side of the house seems pretty busy as they respond to a bunch of the residences in the Seaport. MPDFeb 10, Massport job app must include the following prerequisite:.
Last edited: Feb 11, USAFFeb 11, Joel98 and colonel like this. Never mind patrolling on summer days in the seaport. This is like if UMASS was using state pd to patrol the main campus and then their pd at only a small satellite campus.
Plus the state pd are constantly complaining about budget and staffing so this would free up an entire troop to be redistributed. Seems like a no brainer to me which of course means it doesnt make any sense in this state. Joel98jjm98 and mpd61 like this. This law is outdated, just like the second amendment Roy FehlerFeb 16, Joel98Goose38bigblock and 4 others like this.
Massport fire. Thats where its at lol. USAFFeb 19,